| 翻訳と辞書 |
| I.C. Golak Nath and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Anr. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
I.C. Golaknath and Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anrs.
''Golaknath v. State Of Punjab'' (1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762), or simply the ''Golaknath case'', was a 1967 Indian Supreme Court case, in which the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.〔(L. C. Golaknath V. State Of Punjab )〕
==Facts==
The family of Henry and William Golak Nath held over 500 acres of farmland in Jalandar, Punjab. In the face of the 1953 Punjab Security and Land Tenures Act, the state government held that the brothers could keep only thirty acres each, a few acres would go to tenants and the rest was declared 'surplus'. This was challenged by the Golak Nath family in the courts and the case was referred to the Supreme Court in 1965.
The family filed a petition under Article 32 challenging the 1953 Punjab Act on the ground that it denied them their constitutional rights to acquire and hold property and practice any profession (Articles 19(f) and (g)) and to equality before and equal protection of the law (Article 14). They also sought to have the Seventeenth Amendment – which had placed the Punjab Act in the Ninth Schedule – declared ''ultra vires'.
The issues involved were whether Amendment is a “law” under the meaning of Article 13(2), and whether Fundamental Rights can be amended or not.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「I.C. Golaknath and Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anrs.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|